Print

J.S.D. Candidates

Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

Israel
J.S.D. / Associate-in-Law
Morris Fellow

Education:
LL.M., Columbia Law School (James Kent Scholar)
LL.B., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Law School (magna cum laude)

Awards and Scholarships:
Fulbright Grant
David E. Fischman Scholarship

Dissertation:
Separating Law-Making from Sausage-Making - A New Model of Judicial Review of the Legislative Process
Faithful, perhaps, to the old adage that "people who like sausages and respect the law should never watch either being made," the US Supreme Court has been reluctant for many years to exercise judicial review of the lawmaking process. My dissertation will challenge this approach and argue that it is time for a comprehensive theoretical and empirical study about judicial review of the legislative process in general, and its applicability to the United States in particular.

My research project has three major goals. The first is to demonstrate the practical need for judicial review of the legislative process and to establish its theoretical basis. The second goal is to examine the different academic and practical models of judicial review of the lawmaking process in the United States and in other countries. This examination will provide theoretic and empirical criteria to appraise the desirability of these models among themselves and in comparison to substantive judicial review and other possible non-judicial means for shaping lawmaking. The third goal is to construct a new model of judicial review of the legislative process. This model will provide an alternative to the traditional model of substantive judicial review, as well as to existing models of judicial review of the legislative process.

Professional Experience:
Columbia Law School, Associate-in-Law, 2007-2009
The Supreme Court of Israel, Permanent Senior Law Clerk to Justice Dorit Beinisch, 2002 -2005
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Law School, Research Assistant to Professor Menahem Elon, 2001-2002
The Israel Democracy Institute, Research Assistant to Professor Mordechai Kremnitzer, 2000-2001

ib2147@columbia.edu

Back to top

Gur Bligh

Israel
Heffernan Fellow

Education:
LL.M., Columbia University School of Law (James Kent Scholar)
LL.B., Hebrew University, Faculty of Law (summa cum laude)
LL.B., Hebrew University, Faculty of Humanities, Humanities Interdisciplinary Program (summa cum laude)

Interpreting Precedents: Developing An Interpretative Methodology For Interpreting Judicial Decisions
Judicial decisions are one of the central sources of law in common law legal systems. Like other sources of law that are expressed in the form of an authoritative text, judicial decisions often require interpretation. The need to interpret judicial decisions has significantly increased as court decisions have become longer and more complex and as decisions often include elaborate doctrines and tests. My research has two main aims: first, I intend to examine the methods of interpretation employed by lower courts interpreting higher court decisions. Second, I intend to develop a comprehensive methodology for interpreting judicial decisions comparable to methodologies developed in the fields of statutory and constitutional interpretation.

Fellowships and Appointments:
Columbia University School of Law, Fulbright Scholar, 2005-present
Hebrew University, Faculty of Law, 2001-2003, Teaching Instructor,
Jurisprudence.
Hebrew University, Faculty of Law, 1999-2001, Teaching Assistant, Contract
Law and Jurisprudence.
Hebrew University, Faculty of Law, 1998-2000, Research Assistant, Private
Law and Constitutional Law.

gb2171@columbia.edu

Back to top

Eric Dannenmaier

U.S.A.
Bretzfelder Fellow

Education:
M.St., Oxford University (candidate)
LL.M., Columbia University (James Kent Scholar)
J.D., Boston University (G. Joseph Tauro Scholar)
B.A., Drury College (President's Scholar)

My JSD dissertation is tentatively entitled "Self Government and Sovereignty in International Law," and examines the relationship of comparative constitutional ideas of citizen sovereignty and participatory government to the evolution and understanding of state sovereignty in international law as a means to rethink and reinforce arguments for non-state actor participation in international lawmaking.  My broader research agenda relates to law and international development, with a particular focus on natural resource management, property rights, and the process of making decisions about development alternatives.

I'm working on the JSD as part of a transition to full-time teaching.  I served as Director of Tulane Law School's Environmental Law and Policy Institute in New Orleans (2001-05) and as a legal advisor to the US Agency for International Development (1995-2001), and in both positions worked with a number of international agencies, government institutions, and non-governmental organizations on legal reform projects relating to law and natural resource development.  I spent the early part of my career in practice in Boston and Washington, DC.

erd2111@columbia.edu

Back to top

Marc De Girolami

U.S.A.
Bretzfelder Fellow

Education:
LL.M., Columbia Law School (Walter Gellhorn Prize, James Kent Scholar)
J.D., Boston University School of Law
M.A., Harvard University
B.A., Duke University

I am writing about the intersection of religion and law in a variety of contexts.  My research explores the question of teaching about religion in public schools, the problem of constitutional definitions of religion, and the ongoing debate about the appropriate role of religious belief in forming political judgment.

Prior to enrolling in the J.S.D. program, I was a law clerk for Judge Jerome Farris, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and for Judge William E. Smith, U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island.  I also worked in private practice as an Associate in the litigation department of Sullivan & Worcester, LLP in Boston.  I'm presently working part time as an Assistant District Attorney in the Appellate Division in Middlesex County, Massachusetts.

Publications:
"Recoiling From Religion," 43 San Diego Law Review (forthcoming 2006)
"The New Religious Prisons and Their Retributivist Commitments," 59 Arkansas Law Review 1 (2006) "Congressional Threats of Removal Against Federal Judges," 10 Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights 111 (2005)

md2377@columbia.edu

Back to top

Sang Yop Kang

Korea

Education:
Visiting Scholar, Columbia Law School
LL.M., Columbia Law School
M.A.L.D., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
LL.B., Yonsei University (Korea)
B.A. (Economics), Yonsei University (Korea)
 
Fields of Research:
Corporate Governance
Corporate Law / Securities and Capital Markets
Economic Analysis of Corporate Law          

Before I studied law, I worked as a fund manager in an asset management firm.  Since then, I have been very interested in corporate governance, which is my main field of research in the J.S.D. Program at Columbia.  The following is a brief description of my dissertation.

In developing countries, it is quite common that a certain group of “families” run their business conglomerates as controlling shareholders.  In these jurisdictions, minority shareholders are poorly protected within formal structures, such as corporate and securities laws and judicial systems.  In theory, there should not be so many minority shareholders in these “bad-law countries” since laws insufficiently protect minority shareholders.  In reality, however, a significant number of minority shareholders have participated within many bad-law countries, while some countries are exemplary in terms of their economic development.  The purpose of my current research is to offer potential answers to this conundrum, which has not been comprehensively charted as of yet.  In order to explain this anomaly, I believe that we should rely on other frameworks, such as informal institutions and the hidden incentives of each party in corporations, as commentators have not yet paid this topic adequate attention.  Since I firmly believe that current corporate governance issues are complex reflections of politics, history, finance, and the psyches of interested parties as well as law, my research will rely heavily on interdisciplinary work – many theories of political science, economics and legal doctrines will be re-interpreted in the context of corporate governance of controlling ownership.

Back to top

Tali Schaefer

Israel
Heffernan Fellow

Education:
LL.M., Columbia Law School
M.A., Tel Aviv School of History
LL.B., Tel Aviv Law School

My dissertation consists of three articles.  The first article, entitled "Disposable Mothers," focuses on paid in-home caretakers and explores the intricate interactions between changes in the structures of the American family, the shifting demands of US labor market and global trends of worker migration.

Fields of Research:
Family Law
Law and Society
Citizenship Law

Additional Research Interests:
Feminist Legal Theory
Immigration Law

Recent Appointments & Awards:
ISERP Graduate Fellow, Columbia University, 2006-2007
Harlan Fiske Scholar, Columbia Law School, 2005
Columbia Law School, Research Assistant to Prof. Cynthia Estlund, 2005
Academic Distinction Scholarship, Tel Aviv School of History, 2003
Kurt Lion Foundation Fellowship, University of Constance, Germany, 2002-2003 Publications

Publications:
"Look Back at Anger: The Politics of Emotions in the Middle Ages," 87 Zmanim 22 (in Hebrew).

ts2195@columbia.edu

Back to top

Rozeta Shembilku

Tirana, Albania

Education:
LL.M., Columbia Law School
M.E.S., Karl-Franzes University of Graz, Austria
M.A.L.D., The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
LL.B., Faculty of Law, University of Tirana, Albania.

J.S.D. Research Project:
Tentative Title: “Designing a Legal Framework for Democratic Change”

The theme of this research project is the power of democracy-promoting legal order (law) in shaping the formation of democratic institutions and social transformations designed to achieve democratic change.  

My principal aim is to link the development of a legal framework with the notion of deliberative democracy in order to create the necessary preconditions for a successful democratization and a well-functioning democratic order.

The research project seeks to examine the legal mechanisms and various ways in which law and institutions interact with social and political forces in the process of building relationships that feature “broad, equal, protected and mutually binding consultation” in the context of democratizing societies.  In particular, the dissertation will discuss and formulate specific prescriptions for the project of constitutionalism, the electoral system, the use of judicial power, and the law-making process as superior mechanisms for bringing about deliberative democracy and desired legal change.

Fields of Research:
Rule of Law
Legislation
International Law
European Union Integration.

Professional Experience:
2006-2007, Diplomatic Advisor to the Government of Albania, Cabinet of the Prime Minister
2004-2005, Capacity Building Facility Advisor to the Government of Kosovo, Office of the Prime Minister
2000-2001, Assistant Programme Coordinator, Royal Danish Embassy in Tirana, Albania

Back to top

Carolijn Terwindt

The Netherlands
Finkelstein Fellow

Education:
Utrecht University, Anthropology 2004
Master Thesis: Puzzle of Violence. A discourse analysis after the legitimization of violence in the Mapuche conflict in Chile
Utrecht University, Law 2004
Master Thesis: The Challenge of the Monopoly of Force

Fields of Research:
Legal and Political Philosophy
Conflict Studies
Criminal Justice System

Additional Research Interests:
Legitimization of Violence
Discourse Analysis
Critical Criminology

The working title of my research is: Prosecution on the Edge of Escalation: "Which Story Do You Tell Mr. Prosecutor?" That is the question I will ask in several situations of violent political conflict with regards to the prosecutors engaged in criminal proceedings against rebels, activists or ‘terrorists.' An actual risk of prosecution of crime in conflict might be that it does indeed stop the criminal acts in the short run, but radicalizes the conflict in the long run. My starting point is that the escalation process depends not so much on whether there is a criminal intervention, but more on the manner in which the prosecution is performed. Contrary to regular criminal prosecutions, in a situation of violent political conflict the legitimacy of the government and its monopoly of force are threatened. The criminal intervention in that case also serves to regain legitimacy.

Since my childhood I have been fascinated by violence and the most effective ways to deal with it. This research combines my specialization in conflict studies at the Center for Conflict Studies in Utrecht, Netherlands and my choice to focus on criminal law and criminology at the Utrecht Law School. 
 
After graduation I taught at the Center for Conflict Studies and the International School for Humanities and Social Sciences. In addition I founded "Stichting StadsSpelen", a civil society association organizing Urban Olympic Games in Amsterdam. Furthermore I worked as an intern in a criminal law firm and at the International Criminal Court.

ct2273@columbia.edu

Back to top